Most dayparting tools hand you a heatmap and leave the thinking to you. This one opens with a ranked action plan: what to change, what each move is worth per month, and the arithmetic behind the number — judged against your target ACOS, not your own average. And when the honest answer is “this is not a dayparting problem”, it says so.
Turns your hourly report into a decision, not a dashboard — then shows its working so you can check it.
This needs the hourly report — not the bulk file the other tools use.
Sponsored Products campaign report with time unit set to Hourly — .csv or .xlsx
Parsing rows…
The maths is unforgiving, and almost no tool tells you about it.
Seven days times twenty-four hours is 168 cells. An account with 900 clicks a fortnight averages five per cell. Five clicks tells you nothing at all.
At a 5% conversion rate, a healthy hour with 20 clicks shows zero orders about a third of the time. Cutting it is a coin toss dressed as analysis.
An hour with no clicks is not converting badly — your ads were not running. Usually the budget ran out. Lowering bids changes nothing.
Amazon gives most sellers no native hourly bid scheduling. A recommendation of −30% at 3am needs a rules engine or a person awake at 3am.
Every finding is priced, ranked, and gated on two tests before it is shown as a recommendation.
The first tab is a ranked list of specific moves — cut this window by this much, raise that day’s budget — each carrying what it is worth per month, how confident the evidence is, and whether you need a scheduler to do it. Every card shows the arithmetic that produced its number, so you can check the reasoning instead of trusting it.
If your ACOS gap is spread evenly across the clock, the honest finding is that your bids are too high everywhere — a problem no schedule can fix. The tool measures how much of its own recommendation survives when judged against your account average rather than your target, and when the answer is “almost none”, it says so at the top of the page and tells you what to do instead.
Every window is measured against the ACOS you actually need, because an hour that beats a losing average is still losing. Spend is known exactly; sales are not, so each window is tested at both ends of its own plausible range. Nothing is cut unless even its best case misses target, and nothing is scaled unless even its worst case beats it.
The tool works out how many clicks a bucket needs before "nothing converted here" is meaningful, using your own conversion rate. At 5% that is around 60 clicks; at 12% it is closer to 24. Buckets below the line are shown with their click count and no verdict.
A day converting at 7% against an account average of 5% might be a real pattern or ordinary variation. A two-proportion test decides which, and only differences that clear 95% confidence are reported as findings.
You still get the full 168-cell view, because the shape is useful — a wall of empty evenings tells you budget is gone by mid-afternoon. But cells that cannot support a decision are never dressed up as bid advice.
When the data cannot answer a question, the tool says so and estimates how many more days at your current click rate would change that. A clear "not yet" is worth more than a confident wrong number.
There is no server and no upload. The file is read by JavaScript in your browser and gone when you close the tab, and the finished plan exports to CSV the same way. Load the page, disconnect from the internet, and everything still works — which is the only real proof of the claim.
Concentrating budget into the hours that convert, and when it is worth the effort.
Read the guide → BudgetAllocating spend across campaigns and spotting where budget runs out early.
Read the guide → ReportingReading Amazon's reports without fooling yourself about what they prove.
Read the guide → ToolScore the whole account across nine categories before optimising the clock.
Open the tool → ToolMake the bid and budget changes, validated before you upload them.
Open the tool → AllThe full set, grouped by the stage of work they belong to.
Browse tools →Reading these numbers correctly is most of the job. If you would rather someone did that for you — and then acted on it — that is what I do.