Almost every seller sets placement modifiers from ACOS. That is the wrong metric — placement ACOS is a blend of every keyword and modifier underneath it. This tool sets them from conversion rate, the way the maths actually works, then gives you the base bid change that has to move with them. It ends with a bulk file you can upload.
Reads the placement rows already sitting in your bulk file and works out what each modifier should be.
This uses the standard Sponsored Products bulk file — the same one the other tools take.
Bulk operations export with performance data included — .xlsx or .csv
Parsing rows…
It is the number everyone optimises on, and it is measuring the wrong thing.
A modifier multiplies every keyword bid underneath it. Placement ACOS is therefore a blend of every keyword and every modifier in the campaign — partly a record of your own past decisions rather than a property of the slot.
Top of Search often shows the highest ACOS and the highest conversion rate at once. Cutting its modifier surrenders your best-converting position and moves the same spend somewhere that converts worse.
Lower bids lose better placements, which lowers conversion rate, which makes the automation lower bids again. The rule that fired first produces the poor performance it was responding to.
Modifiers decide distribution. Bids decide price level. Change one without the other and you either inflate spend or lose the placement you were trying to win.
Conversion rate sets the modifier. Target ACOS sets the bid. They are not interchangeable.
Your lowest-converting placement becomes the 0% baseline and the others receive their relative lift: ((placement CVR − lowest CVR) ÷ lowest CVR) × 100. Change your target ACOS from 15% to 40% and the modifiers do not move, because the target belongs to the bid. That is not a simplification — it is the whole point.
Every recommendation ships as a pair: the modifiers and the ad group bid that has to move with them. The tool shows your blended multiplier before and after, so you can see exactly how much your effective CPC would drift if you changed the modifiers alone. Most tools hand you half the change and let you discover the other half on your invoice.
When Top of Search has your worst ACOS and your best conversion rate, the tool tells you plainly not to cut that modifier — it is a bid problem wearing a placement costume. A tool that only ever agrees with your first instinct is not adding anything.
Your bulk file carries four placement rows, but Amazon Business overlaps the other three rather than adding to them. Sum all four and your placement spend exceeds your campaign spend. It is reported separately and excluded from every calculation, which is why the totals here reconcile.
A conversion gap between two placements can be a real difference or an ordinary run of luck. A two-proportion test decides which, and a gap that fails it leaves the modifier where it is rather than receiving an invented percentage. Placements under the click threshold are never used as the baseline, since everything else is measured against it.
The export is a real bulk sheet: Operation set to Update, IDs written as text so 15-digit campaign IDs survive Excel, and the placement names left exactly as Amazon wrote them rather than helpfully rewritten into the spelling that gets uploads rejected. Nothing else in the file is touched.
Operation set to Update and every other value carried over untouched from your own file — including the placement names, which are deliberately not rewritten. Review it first, as you should with any bulk upload, then submit it through Bulk operations. Nothing else in your account is affected.The CVR method for placements in full, with the worked example this tool implements.
Read the guide → GuideWhy bids and placements have to move together, and what happens when they do not.
Read the guide → GuideIncluding the placement ACOS deception and the bid-placement death spiral.
Read the guide → ToolMake the base bid changes this tool recommends, validated before you upload them.
Open the tool → ToolScore the whole account across nine categories before optimising placements.
Open the tool → AllThe full set, grouped by the stage of work they belong to.
Browse tools →Placements are one lever of about forty. If you would rather have all of them managed properly — and measured afterwards — that is what I do.